Review



phosphorylated mapk8  (Novus Biologicals)


Bioz Verified Symbol Novus Biologicals is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Novus Biologicals manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 88

    Structured Review

    Novus Biologicals phosphorylated mapk8
    Fig. 3 <t>MAPK8</t> and IKBKE mediate the stiffness-induced breast cancer phenotype. a, Venn diagram (left) and table (right) showing overlap between ki nases predicted to be upregulated by stiffness and downregulated by AIIB2 treatment. b, Workflow for the siRNA-based screen used to test the function of predicted kinases, and all conditions were run in duplicates. c, Representative phenotype of CA1a cells on high stiffness hydrogels transfected with siRNA as specified. FAK siRNA serves as positive control. Images are single tiles from 6 × 6 montages. Scale bar = 50 μm. d, Area fraction of segmented cell clusters expressed relative to MOCK (Gene of interest/MOCK). The area fraction is calculated as the ratio between the total area and the area of the thresholded objects. Positive control (FAK siRNA) is shown in red. Data represents the average of two technical replicates. Genes whose knockdown results in a similar or lower relative area fraction as the positive control are considered hits, including MAPK8 and IKBKE
    Phosphorylated Mapk8, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 2 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/phosphorylated mapk8/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 88 stars, based on 2 article reviews
    phosphorylated mapk8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    88/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Matrix stiffness-induced IKBKE and MAPK8 signaling drives a phenotypic switch from DCIS to invasive breast cancer."

    Article Title: Matrix stiffness-induced IKBKE and MAPK8 signaling drives a phenotypic switch from DCIS to invasive breast cancer.

    Journal: Cell communication and signaling : CCS

    doi: 10.1186/s12964-025-02276-y

    Fig. 3 MAPK8 and IKBKE mediate the stiffness-induced breast cancer phenotype. a, Venn diagram (left) and table (right) showing overlap between ki nases predicted to be upregulated by stiffness and downregulated by AIIB2 treatment. b, Workflow for the siRNA-based screen used to test the function of predicted kinases, and all conditions were run in duplicates. c, Representative phenotype of CA1a cells on high stiffness hydrogels transfected with siRNA as specified. FAK siRNA serves as positive control. Images are single tiles from 6 × 6 montages. Scale bar = 50 μm. d, Area fraction of segmented cell clusters expressed relative to MOCK (Gene of interest/MOCK). The area fraction is calculated as the ratio between the total area and the area of the thresholded objects. Positive control (FAK siRNA) is shown in red. Data represents the average of two technical replicates. Genes whose knockdown results in a similar or lower relative area fraction as the positive control are considered hits, including MAPK8 and IKBKE
    Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 3 MAPK8 and IKBKE mediate the stiffness-induced breast cancer phenotype. a, Venn diagram (left) and table (right) showing overlap between ki nases predicted to be upregulated by stiffness and downregulated by AIIB2 treatment. b, Workflow for the siRNA-based screen used to test the function of predicted kinases, and all conditions were run in duplicates. c, Representative phenotype of CA1a cells on high stiffness hydrogels transfected with siRNA as specified. FAK siRNA serves as positive control. Images are single tiles from 6 × 6 montages. Scale bar = 50 μm. d, Area fraction of segmented cell clusters expressed relative to MOCK (Gene of interest/MOCK). The area fraction is calculated as the ratio between the total area and the area of the thresholded objects. Positive control (FAK siRNA) is shown in red. Data represents the average of two technical replicates. Genes whose knockdown results in a similar or lower relative area fraction as the positive control are considered hits, including MAPK8 and IKBKE

    Techniques Used: Transfection, Positive Control, Knockdown

    Fig. 5 Matrix stiffness-induced MAPK8 activity is critical for breast cancer cell proliferation in vitro. a, Immunoblot analysis of MAPK8 (left), and phospho- MAPK8 (right) of CA1a cells cultured on 0.4 kPa or 5 kPa hydrogels. Densitometric analysis shows MAPK8 and phospho-MAPK8 levels normalized to load ing controls (ponceau S staining, Supplementary Fig. 2a and 2c) and expressed relative to the low stiffness levels. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M., with p-values according to an unpaired t-test. b, Representative Edu staining images of CA1a cells grown on 5 kPa transfected with MAPK8 or control siRNA pool (left) and quantification of three biological repeats (> 1000 cells each; right). Scale bar = 50 μm. Data are mean ± S.E.M and p-values according to an unpaired t-test. c, Representative images of actin (top row) and Edu staining (bottom row) in HCC1143 cells treated with MAPK8 or control siRNAs (left). Quantification of area fraction of segmented cell clusters relative to control siRNA of three biological repeats (right). Scale bar = 50 μm. Data are mean ± S.E.M and p-values derived by one-way Anova with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. d, e, Spinning disc confocal images of breast cancer cells on 5 kPa treated with 5 µM (CA1a, d) or 10 µM ( HCC1143, e) JNK-IN-8 or vehicle for 24 h(left). Quantification of actin staining (top row) and Edu staining (bottom row) of three or more independent experiments(right). Scale bar = 50 μm. Relative area fraction as in (c). Data and statistics as in (b)
    Figure Legend Snippet: Fig. 5 Matrix stiffness-induced MAPK8 activity is critical for breast cancer cell proliferation in vitro. a, Immunoblot analysis of MAPK8 (left), and phospho- MAPK8 (right) of CA1a cells cultured on 0.4 kPa or 5 kPa hydrogels. Densitometric analysis shows MAPK8 and phospho-MAPK8 levels normalized to load ing controls (ponceau S staining, Supplementary Fig. 2a and 2c) and expressed relative to the low stiffness levels. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M., with p-values according to an unpaired t-test. b, Representative Edu staining images of CA1a cells grown on 5 kPa transfected with MAPK8 or control siRNA pool (left) and quantification of three biological repeats (> 1000 cells each; right). Scale bar = 50 μm. Data are mean ± S.E.M and p-values according to an unpaired t-test. c, Representative images of actin (top row) and Edu staining (bottom row) in HCC1143 cells treated with MAPK8 or control siRNAs (left). Quantification of area fraction of segmented cell clusters relative to control siRNA of three biological repeats (right). Scale bar = 50 μm. Data are mean ± S.E.M and p-values derived by one-way Anova with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. d, e, Spinning disc confocal images of breast cancer cells on 5 kPa treated with 5 µM (CA1a, d) or 10 µM ( HCC1143, e) JNK-IN-8 or vehicle for 24 h(left). Quantification of actin staining (top row) and Edu staining (bottom row) of three or more independent experiments(right). Scale bar = 50 μm. Relative area fraction as in (c). Data and statistics as in (b)

    Techniques Used: Activity Assay, In Vitro, Western Blot, Cell Culture, Staining, Transfection, Control, Derivative Assay, Comparison



    Similar Products

    88
    Novus Biologicals phosphorylated mapk8
    Fig. 3 <t>MAPK8</t> and IKBKE mediate the stiffness-induced breast cancer phenotype. a, Venn diagram (left) and table (right) showing overlap between ki nases predicted to be upregulated by stiffness and downregulated by AIIB2 treatment. b, Workflow for the siRNA-based screen used to test the function of predicted kinases, and all conditions were run in duplicates. c, Representative phenotype of CA1a cells on high stiffness hydrogels transfected with siRNA as specified. FAK siRNA serves as positive control. Images are single tiles from 6 × 6 montages. Scale bar = 50 μm. d, Area fraction of segmented cell clusters expressed relative to MOCK (Gene of interest/MOCK). The area fraction is calculated as the ratio between the total area and the area of the thresholded objects. Positive control (FAK siRNA) is shown in red. Data represents the average of two technical replicates. Genes whose knockdown results in a similar or lower relative area fraction as the positive control are considered hits, including MAPK8 and IKBKE
    Phosphorylated Mapk8, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 88/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/phosphorylated mapk8/product/Novus Biologicals
    Average 88 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    phosphorylated mapk8 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    88/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    Bio-Rad phosphorylated jnk1 2
    Fig. 3 <t>MAPK8</t> and IKBKE mediate the stiffness-induced breast cancer phenotype. a, Venn diagram (left) and table (right) showing overlap between ki nases predicted to be upregulated by stiffness and downregulated by AIIB2 treatment. b, Workflow for the siRNA-based screen used to test the function of predicted kinases, and all conditions were run in duplicates. c, Representative phenotype of CA1a cells on high stiffness hydrogels transfected with siRNA as specified. FAK siRNA serves as positive control. Images are single tiles from 6 × 6 montages. Scale bar = 50 μm. d, Area fraction of segmented cell clusters expressed relative to MOCK (Gene of interest/MOCK). The area fraction is calculated as the ratio between the total area and the area of the thresholded objects. Positive control (FAK siRNA) is shown in red. Data represents the average of two technical replicates. Genes whose knockdown results in a similar or lower relative area fraction as the positive control are considered hits, including MAPK8 and IKBKE
    Phosphorylated Jnk1 2, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/phosphorylated jnk1 2/product/Bio-Rad
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    phosphorylated jnk1 2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    97
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti phosphorylated mapk8 9
    Fig. 3 <t>MAPK8</t> and IKBKE mediate the stiffness-induced breast cancer phenotype. a, Venn diagram (left) and table (right) showing overlap between ki nases predicted to be upregulated by stiffness and downregulated by AIIB2 treatment. b, Workflow for the siRNA-based screen used to test the function of predicted kinases, and all conditions were run in duplicates. c, Representative phenotype of CA1a cells on high stiffness hydrogels transfected with siRNA as specified. FAK siRNA serves as positive control. Images are single tiles from 6 × 6 montages. Scale bar = 50 μm. d, Area fraction of segmented cell clusters expressed relative to MOCK (Gene of interest/MOCK). The area fraction is calculated as the ratio between the total area and the area of the thresholded objects. Positive control (FAK siRNA) is shown in red. Data represents the average of two technical replicates. Genes whose knockdown results in a similar or lower relative area fraction as the positive control are considered hits, including MAPK8 and IKBKE
    Anti Phosphorylated Mapk8 9, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 97/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti phosphorylated mapk8 9/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 97 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti phosphorylated mapk8 9 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    97/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc antibodies for phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinase 8/9/10 (mapk8/9/10 [previously designated as jnk1/2/3)]
    Fig. 3 <t>MAPK8</t> and IKBKE mediate the stiffness-induced breast cancer phenotype. a, Venn diagram (left) and table (right) showing overlap between ki nases predicted to be upregulated by stiffness and downregulated by AIIB2 treatment. b, Workflow for the siRNA-based screen used to test the function of predicted kinases, and all conditions were run in duplicates. c, Representative phenotype of CA1a cells on high stiffness hydrogels transfected with siRNA as specified. FAK siRNA serves as positive control. Images are single tiles from 6 × 6 montages. Scale bar = 50 μm. d, Area fraction of segmented cell clusters expressed relative to MOCK (Gene of interest/MOCK). The area fraction is calculated as the ratio between the total area and the area of the thresholded objects. Positive control (FAK siRNA) is shown in red. Data represents the average of two technical replicates. Genes whose knockdown results in a similar or lower relative area fraction as the positive control are considered hits, including MAPK8 and IKBKE
    Antibodies For Phosphorylated Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase 8/9/10 (Mapk8/9/10 [Previously Designated As Jnk1/2/3)], supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies for phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinase 8/9/10 (mapk8/9/10 [previously designated as jnk1/2/3)]/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibodies for phosphorylated mitogen-activated protein kinase 8/9/10 (mapk8/9/10 [previously designated as jnk1/2/3)] - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti-human phosphorylation-specific mapk8/9 (thr183/tyr185) (cs9251)
    Fig. 3 <t>MAPK8</t> and IKBKE mediate the stiffness-induced breast cancer phenotype. a, Venn diagram (left) and table (right) showing overlap between ki nases predicted to be upregulated by stiffness and downregulated by AIIB2 treatment. b, Workflow for the siRNA-based screen used to test the function of predicted kinases, and all conditions were run in duplicates. c, Representative phenotype of CA1a cells on high stiffness hydrogels transfected with siRNA as specified. FAK siRNA serves as positive control. Images are single tiles from 6 × 6 montages. Scale bar = 50 μm. d, Area fraction of segmented cell clusters expressed relative to MOCK (Gene of interest/MOCK). The area fraction is calculated as the ratio between the total area and the area of the thresholded objects. Positive control (FAK siRNA) is shown in red. Data represents the average of two technical replicates. Genes whose knockdown results in a similar or lower relative area fraction as the positive control are considered hits, including MAPK8 and IKBKE
    Anti Human Phosphorylation Specific Mapk8/9 (Thr183/Tyr185) (Cs9251), supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-human phosphorylation-specific mapk8/9 (thr183/tyr185) (cs9251)/product/Cell Signaling Technology Inc
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti-human phosphorylation-specific mapk8/9 (thr183/tyr185) (cs9251) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Fig. 3 MAPK8 and IKBKE mediate the stiffness-induced breast cancer phenotype. a, Venn diagram (left) and table (right) showing overlap between ki nases predicted to be upregulated by stiffness and downregulated by AIIB2 treatment. b, Workflow for the siRNA-based screen used to test the function of predicted kinases, and all conditions were run in duplicates. c, Representative phenotype of CA1a cells on high stiffness hydrogels transfected with siRNA as specified. FAK siRNA serves as positive control. Images are single tiles from 6 × 6 montages. Scale bar = 50 μm. d, Area fraction of segmented cell clusters expressed relative to MOCK (Gene of interest/MOCK). The area fraction is calculated as the ratio between the total area and the area of the thresholded objects. Positive control (FAK siRNA) is shown in red. Data represents the average of two technical replicates. Genes whose knockdown results in a similar or lower relative area fraction as the positive control are considered hits, including MAPK8 and IKBKE

    Journal: Cell communication and signaling : CCS

    Article Title: Matrix stiffness-induced IKBKE and MAPK8 signaling drives a phenotypic switch from DCIS to invasive breast cancer.

    doi: 10.1186/s12964-025-02276-y

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 3 MAPK8 and IKBKE mediate the stiffness-induced breast cancer phenotype. a, Venn diagram (left) and table (right) showing overlap between ki nases predicted to be upregulated by stiffness and downregulated by AIIB2 treatment. b, Workflow for the siRNA-based screen used to test the function of predicted kinases, and all conditions were run in duplicates. c, Representative phenotype of CA1a cells on high stiffness hydrogels transfected with siRNA as specified. FAK siRNA serves as positive control. Images are single tiles from 6 × 6 montages. Scale bar = 50 μm. d, Area fraction of segmented cell clusters expressed relative to MOCK (Gene of interest/MOCK). The area fraction is calculated as the ratio between the total area and the area of the thresholded objects. Positive control (FAK siRNA) is shown in red. Data represents the average of two technical replicates. Genes whose knockdown results in a similar or lower relative area fraction as the positive control are considered hits, including MAPK8 and IKBKE

    Article Snippet: Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk (PanReac AppliChem) in TBST (20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20, pH 7.4) for 1 h at RT, followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C with primary antibodies against IKBKE (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat. #D20G4, 1:1000), phosphorylated-MAPK8 (Novus Biologicals; Cat. #NB100-82009; 1:2000), or total-MAPK8 (Santa Cruz; Cat. #sc-1648; 1:5000).

    Techniques: Transfection, Positive Control, Knockdown

    Fig. 5 Matrix stiffness-induced MAPK8 activity is critical for breast cancer cell proliferation in vitro. a, Immunoblot analysis of MAPK8 (left), and phospho- MAPK8 (right) of CA1a cells cultured on 0.4 kPa or 5 kPa hydrogels. Densitometric analysis shows MAPK8 and phospho-MAPK8 levels normalized to load ing controls (ponceau S staining, Supplementary Fig. 2a and 2c) and expressed relative to the low stiffness levels. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M., with p-values according to an unpaired t-test. b, Representative Edu staining images of CA1a cells grown on 5 kPa transfected with MAPK8 or control siRNA pool (left) and quantification of three biological repeats (> 1000 cells each; right). Scale bar = 50 μm. Data are mean ± S.E.M and p-values according to an unpaired t-test. c, Representative images of actin (top row) and Edu staining (bottom row) in HCC1143 cells treated with MAPK8 or control siRNAs (left). Quantification of area fraction of segmented cell clusters relative to control siRNA of three biological repeats (right). Scale bar = 50 μm. Data are mean ± S.E.M and p-values derived by one-way Anova with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. d, e, Spinning disc confocal images of breast cancer cells on 5 kPa treated with 5 µM (CA1a, d) or 10 µM ( HCC1143, e) JNK-IN-8 or vehicle for 24 h(left). Quantification of actin staining (top row) and Edu staining (bottom row) of three or more independent experiments(right). Scale bar = 50 μm. Relative area fraction as in (c). Data and statistics as in (b)

    Journal: Cell communication and signaling : CCS

    Article Title: Matrix stiffness-induced IKBKE and MAPK8 signaling drives a phenotypic switch from DCIS to invasive breast cancer.

    doi: 10.1186/s12964-025-02276-y

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Fig. 5 Matrix stiffness-induced MAPK8 activity is critical for breast cancer cell proliferation in vitro. a, Immunoblot analysis of MAPK8 (left), and phospho- MAPK8 (right) of CA1a cells cultured on 0.4 kPa or 5 kPa hydrogels. Densitometric analysis shows MAPK8 and phospho-MAPK8 levels normalized to load ing controls (ponceau S staining, Supplementary Fig. 2a and 2c) and expressed relative to the low stiffness levels. Data are presented as mean ± S.E.M., with p-values according to an unpaired t-test. b, Representative Edu staining images of CA1a cells grown on 5 kPa transfected with MAPK8 or control siRNA pool (left) and quantification of three biological repeats (> 1000 cells each; right). Scale bar = 50 μm. Data are mean ± S.E.M and p-values according to an unpaired t-test. c, Representative images of actin (top row) and Edu staining (bottom row) in HCC1143 cells treated with MAPK8 or control siRNAs (left). Quantification of area fraction of segmented cell clusters relative to control siRNA of three biological repeats (right). Scale bar = 50 μm. Data are mean ± S.E.M and p-values derived by one-way Anova with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. d, e, Spinning disc confocal images of breast cancer cells on 5 kPa treated with 5 µM (CA1a, d) or 10 µM ( HCC1143, e) JNK-IN-8 or vehicle for 24 h(left). Quantification of actin staining (top row) and Edu staining (bottom row) of three or more independent experiments(right). Scale bar = 50 μm. Relative area fraction as in (c). Data and statistics as in (b)

    Article Snippet: Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk (PanReac AppliChem) in TBST (20 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween-20, pH 7.4) for 1 h at RT, followed by overnight incubation at 4 °C with primary antibodies against IKBKE (Cell Signaling Technology, Cat. #D20G4, 1:1000), phosphorylated-MAPK8 (Novus Biologicals; Cat. #NB100-82009; 1:2000), or total-MAPK8 (Santa Cruz; Cat. #sc-1648; 1:5000).

    Techniques: Activity Assay, In Vitro, Western Blot, Cell Culture, Staining, Transfection, Control, Derivative Assay, Comparison